Flog #11.2

When I first started making hack #5 I thought I wanted to make another remix with as much AI as possible, so I had ChatGPT write a song at a certain bpm and found a free track that matched that vibe and bpm. I wanted to learn SynthV to create the vocals but I couldn’t get a voice bank to install for free even with the trial (definitely user error). While I was looking for an alternative AI powered vocal synth I found a website called Suno, and I just had to input the lyrics and a short prompt and it made the whole song… it sounded very realistic and this kind of killed my creativity and sent me into this spiral of wondering if I’ve been unknowingly listening to music that was completely created by AI like this song. Because of this crisis I pivoted and decided to remake hack #2 and try to include AI somehow since I’d been wanting to write about AI in some capacity. The only way I could think to do this was to play into something that may become a problem in the near future involving crime, so that’s how I came up with the idea of making an AI cctv spotting game. I’m not sure how well it actually works as a remake since the two projects are quite different, but they’re under the same umbrella of ideas so I thought that was good enough. 

I struggled a lot with actually creating realistic looking cctv images since AI like DALL-E 3 refused to make images depicting crimes, and Stable Diffusion struggled to make images that looked potentially real. I eventually found DeepAI, which seems to have looser restrictions but the images are not as realistic. They seemed to work well enough, though the game is easier than I wanted it to be.

Spot the Artifact

For my beta release, I picked Hack #2: Critical Play and decided to reimagine my game “Put the Bullet Through the CEO”. This time I pulled ideas from Hack #4 and decided to touch on some of the up-and-coming conspiracy theories people are having regarding AI image generation and how that will potentially affect the legal system. As of December 3, 2024, the FBI has recognized this as an ongoing problem in certain sectors and issued a PSA (FBI) informing the public of ways criminals are using AI to deceive people. My game imagines a not-so-distant future where AI is used not only to deceive the public, but to accuse people of crimes. 

My game “Spot the Artifact” aims to evoke a similar feeling to “Spot the Difference” – a children’s game where the goal is to find the differences between two similar images – but instead of differences, your goal is to spot artifacts the AI left behind when generating the image. The player is presented with two images, one real and one AI-generated, and instructed to pick the image showing the “real” suspect. This task is surprisingly difficult, considering real CCTV footage is oftentimes low quality and confusing, making it shockingly similar to the AI-generated images. I wanted to put the player in the shoes of an imagined future detective or lawyer who would need to be able to distinguish between what evidence is real and fake. The mistakes made by the player are meant to incite distrust in their own sense of judgment and make them explore the potential future where false convictions could be made off of fabricated evidence generated by AI. AI has been rapidly improving over the past few years, so as time goes on it will become increasingly difficult to determine which images and videos are real. 

While my alpha version of Hack #2 focuses on the public’s reaction to some criminals and how that is potentially harmful, my beta version takes a more conspiratorial angle and explores a future where false accusations become more believable and commonplace. The overarching theme of crime and how it’s treated is the strongest tie between the two versions, though I think they also have a similar feel. In both projects I aimed to unsettle the player and make their actions in the game the main point of evoking critical thinking. Similar to the alpha version, “Spot the Artifact” is also a reskin of a nostalgic children’s game. I also tried to use some elements of wicked play in how the game is designed. There are no points or real consequences to getting anything wrong, the only feedback the player gets is the screen changing color, and there is no reliable solution on how to tell the images apart. I think detecting AI-generated images is a wicked problem in itself, as there are very few reliable ways to identify them, and the landscape is changing so quickly that these solutions often lag behind the most modern generators. 

Overall, I think my reimagining is fairly removed from the alpha version, though they are in the same conversation. Bringing it back to my alpha version, I would like you to consider a world where the assassination of Brian Thompson happened a few years in the future. Luigi Mangione was caught simply because a McDonald’s employee recognized him from the CCTV images that investigators had released. What happens when AI image generation becomes so advanced that all it takes is one bad actor fabricating data to falsely accuse someone of murder?

Sources Cited

FBI, “Criminals Use Generative Artificial Intelligence to Facilitate Financial Fraud” (2024)

Miguel Sicart, “The Design of Ethical Gameplay” from Beyond Choices (2013)

Media Sources

AI image generator: https://deepai.org/machine-learning-model/text2img 

Real CCTV images (in no particular order): 

Flog #11

This week I mostly worked on my hack and the artist statement. Since I’d clarified my idea last Thursday and collected a lot of material it wasn’t that bad, but actually editing the video was still very hard. I was using After Effects since I have a little bit of experience with it, though I’d forgotten a lot of what I’d learned in the past. It was mostly just time consuming. Most of my problems were solved with some YouTube tutorials, though it was also very glitchy when previewing it for some reason which was frustrating. I wasn’t sure how to fix it since I probably needed an external hard drive to use as a scratch disk which I don’t have with me… 

Writing my artist statement went smoothly for the most part. Some of the cases I referenced in my remix make me pretty angry and I think some of that accidentally came through but there wasn’t a lot I can do about that. I also had a hard time justifying my rule break, but I think that section turned out alright. I tried to add some humor to it but I’m not sure how well that came across. 

Watching everyone else’s remixes was very fun and it gave me a lot of ideas, so maybe I’ll do another remix for the final hack. We’ll see! 

Hack #4: Everybody Likes You Mr. President!

Remix link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=05-PyL4zfXc&t=41s&ab_channel=LillianMilano

Conspiracy theories have captured the minds of many across human history. Only recently have we begun to study this social phenomenon and assess the potential harms. On the surface there are ties with prejudice, witch hunts, revolutions, and genocides (Douglas), though I have found that they can also help keep discussion alive surrounding more isolated cases. Douglas defines a conspiracy theory as “attempts to explain the ultimate causes of significant social and political events and circumstances with claims of secret plots by two or more powerful actors”. I used this definition to identify conspiracy theories for my remix, and my remix primarily spans across the Bill Clinton, Lyndon B. Johnson, and George W. Bush eras. 

When I first started gathering materials for my remix, I listed as many US-based conspiracy theories I could think of, and noticed that the majority of them tied in with different presidential administrations. In the spirit of remix I picked the song “Everybody Likes You” by Lemon Demon since this song heavily samples a clip from one of the Care Bears movies, and also because I thought it could be heard both as “everybody likes you” and “everybody lied to you”. To make sure I covered three distinct time periods I ended up focusing on conspiracies surrounding the probable homicide of Kevin Ives and Don Henry (80’s), the assassination of JFK and LBJ’s presidency (60’s), and Abu Ghraib and 9/11 (00’s). There are a few other scandals and conspiracy theories that are included in the remix, like MKUltra and Clinton’s connection to Jeffery Epstein. However, it was difficult to find good imagery for some of the less documented conspiracies. I wanted to focus on both familiar and unfamiliar cases, as one goal of my remix was to expose people to conspiracies they may have never heard of. 

The majority of the literature you see surrounding conspiracy theories discuss their potential harm, and while I don’t deny that this is something that happens, I would also like to argue that there can be good that comes out of keeping a conspiracy theory alive. A 2012 paper by Charles Pidgen argues that we should leave the possibility of investigating conspiracy theories open, and that while conspiracy theories are largely false, it is also true that “when they are sufficiently well-confirmed, they can rise to the dignity of knowledge” (Pigden, 222). I agree that it is unfair to write off a theory simply because it is a “conspiracy theory”, as the investigation of some theories can lead to shocking discoveries. 

For example, the murder of Kevin Ives and Don Henry is something that has been debated for many years. The initial ruling on the case was that it was an accidental death from a marijuana-induced incapacitation that led to them being hit by a train, though when the bodies were exhumed and reexamined it was found that both teens had much less THC in their systems at their time of death than what was initially determined, and that there was evidence of homicide prior to the incident with the train (Encyclopedia of Arkansas). This further investigation was spurred both by the boys’ parents and by conspiracy theorists that thought these killings had ties with the rumored drug smuggling happening in the area. This incident, and the following disappearances and murders of five of the witnesses on this case, has added evidence to a bigger conspiracy theory surrounding the body count of the Clintons and their involvement with Barry Seal, a now assassinated drug smuggler who operated in Mena, Arkansas. I strongly believe that keeping the conspiracy surrounding their deaths alive was the right thing to do, and that this is a case that should be looked into more thoroughly both for the sake of the victims’ families and to potentially expose government corruption. This is an opinion shared by others, as there have been books and documentaries made about this case, like Boys on the Tracks: Death, Denial, and a Mother’s Crusade to Bring Her Son’s Killers to Justice by Mara Leveritt and The Clinton Chronicles by Patrick Matrisciana. 

My selection of photos, videos, government documents, and articles in my remix also ties into my argument that conspiracy theories can be worth investigating. I wanted to include a blend of infamous and intriguing imagery to both disturb and captivate the viewer. I aimed to overstimulate the viewer with information that devolves into degeneracy before cutting to a contradictory clip of George W. Bush to naturally induce skepticism. A large part of letting yourself believe in a conspiracy theory is finding contradictions between what the actors in power are saying, and the evidence being presented. In the case of Bush and Abu Ghraib, he claims that “the America I know cares about every individual” and that the troops sent to Iraq are “good, honorable citizens”, curating the belief that this is an isolated incident by a few bad actors. Though this is clearly not the case, and was disputed by the Red Cross, Amnesty International, and Human Rights Watch. Investigative documents show a pattern of abuse in prisons throughout this time period and allege that abuse was part of standard procedure in these facilities (Associated Press, Smeulers). In my remix I aimed to paint Bush as a liar whose primary objective was to control public opinion surrounding the release of information on Abu Ghraib. The only thing I hadn’t considered was the possibility that some of my peers may be unfamiliar with this case. This was a case I had decided on very early on in my remix, as I found it had the most easily recognizable imagery aside from 9/11. I was surprised when some of my classmates seemed unfamiliar with it, but in retrospect it makes a lot of sense since my generation was very young (or possibly not even born) when this information first came out. Regardless, I hope the contradiction presented still sparks curiosity about this case, and possibly even the other incidents alluded to in my remix. This conundrum speaks to the cultural differences between generations, as I am sure that events like 9/11 and the public revelation about what happened in Abu Ghraib is much more important to older generations. 

By the time I had finished my remix I was left with only one rule to break, rule 4: you must break one of the rules. From the beginning I thought it would be ironic to place myself into a hypocritical position by “breaking” this rule, as this rule “break” and the overt manipulation of the viewer’s beliefs puts me in a very similar position that I present the former presidents in. By breaking this rule I am technically in compliance with the ruleset, though it appears to be in bad faith, as I am not actually breaking one of the rules. I think this is in itself a commentary on those in power, as I hold some power over the viewer through my remix, and in this justification I can do what Bush and Clinton have done before me and insist that I am right despite the evidence – my remix – that I am actually in the wrong. 

Sources

Karen M. Douglas, et al., “Understanding Conspiracy Theories” (2019), https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/pops.12568 

Charles Pigden, “Conspiracy Theorues and the Conventional Wisdom” (2012), https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/episteme/article/conspiracy-theories-and-the-conventional-wisdom/F493AE4E5065A43AB0420622A9652CCD 

Encyclopedia of Arkansas, “Kevin Ives and Don Henry (Murder of)”, https://encyclopediaofarkansas.net/entries/kevin-ives-and-don-henry-12289/ 

Humans Rights Watch, “The Road to Abu Ghraib” (2004), https://www.hrw.org/report/2004/06/09/road-abu-ghraib

Red Cross and Steven Miles, “Abu Ghraib: its Legacy for Military Medicine” (2004), https://casebook.icrc.org/print/20735 

Amnesty International, “USA: Pattern of brutality and cruelty — war crimes at Abu Ghraib” (2004), https://www.amnesty.org/en/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/amr510772004en.pdf 

Association Press, “AP: Intelligence agents encouraged Iraq abuse” (2004), https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna5094207

A.L. Smeulers, “Abu Ghraib and the War against Terror – a case against Donald Rumsfeld” (2009), https://research.vu.nl/ws/files/2403096/215948.pdf 

Media Sources In Order of Appearance 

-Song: Everybody Likes You; Lemon Demon/Neil Cicierega; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4xElp-lYnyE&ab_channel=NeilCicieregaMusic 

Section 1: Bill Clinton and the Mena Coverup

-Opening clip and picture of Don Henry and Kevin Ives; KATV;  https://katv.com/community/7-on-your-side/boys-on-the-tracks-revisited 

-Picture of Boonie Bearden, Mike Samples, Keith McKaskle, Keith Coney, Jeff Rhodes, Gregory Collins, and newspaper ad posted by Linda Ives; ID Files; https://idfiles.com/investigations/saline-county-grand-jury/ 

-Picture of Linda Ives and newspaper clipping; Arkansas Democrat;  https://www.arkansasonline.com/news/2018/aug/13/judge-dea-satisfy-files-bid/ 

-The Boys on the Tracks cover; CALS; https://encyclopediaofarkansas.net/entries/the-boys-on-the-tracks-book-12011/ 

-FBI document release pages 1 and 2; ID Files; https://idfiles.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/section-2.pdf 

-Picture of Bill Clinton; US Armed Forces; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bill_Clinton 

-Picture of James Steed; ID Files; https://idfiles.com/bad-guys/james-steed/ 

-Picture of Fahmy Malak; ID Files; https://idfiles.com/bad-guys/fahmy-malak/ 

-Picture of Dan Harmon in cuffs; ID Files; https://idfiles.com/bad-guys/dan-harmon/ 

-Picture of Barry Seal; Wikipedia – Unknown author; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barry_Seal 

-Why Is Mena Off Limits? zoom and Bill Clinton walking clip; Patrick Matrisciana; https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0433674/?ref_=mv_close (from documentary)

-Clinton with Epstein 1; Wikipedia – Ralph Alswang, White House photographer; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bill_Clinton#/media/File:Maxwell_Epstein_Clinton_1993_2.jpg

-Clinton with Epstein 2; The Times – The Mega Agency; https://www.thetimes.com/uk/law/article/bill-clintons-friendship-with-jeffrey-epstein-still-casts-a-shadow-553nbwt0w 

-Clinton with Epstein 3; The Times; https://www.thetimes.com/uk/royal-family/article/bill-clinton-jeffrey-epstein-and-ghislaine-maxwell-an-uncomfortable-connection-xsbhcxjkq 

-Clinton with Monica Lewinsky; npr – AP; https://www.npr.org/2016/06/12/481718785/clinton-scandals-a-guide-from-whitewater-to-the-clinton-foundation 

Section 2: MKUltra

-Picture of Paul F. Gaynor; Wikipedia – John Evans; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_F._Gaynor

-Picture of Allen Dulles; Wikipedia – US Government; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allen_Dulles 

-Picture of Richard Helms; USA Today – ABC; https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2016/08/31/cia-helms-fbi-pentagon-papers/89642908/ 

-Picture of William Colby; Wikipedia – Unknown Whitehouse photographer; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Colby 

-Picture of Harris Isbell; Wikipedia – Unknown author; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harris_Isbell

-Picture of Louis Jolyon West; Wikipedia – Unknown author; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Louis_Jolyon_West

-Picture of Donald Ewen Cameron; Wikipedia – PubMed Central; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donald_Ewen_Cameron 

-Picture of Herald Alexander Abramson; Find A Grave – rhale1100; https://www.findagrave.com/memorial/14565614/harold_alexander-abramson 

-Picture of Gerald Ford; Wikipedia – David Hume Kennerly; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gerald_Ford 

Section 3: Assassination of John F. Kennedy/Lyndon B. Johnson and the Vietnam War

-Zapruder film of the assassination of John F. Kennedy; Wikipedia – Abraham Zapruder; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zapruder_film 

-Handbill from the day before the assassination accusing JFK of treason, picture of the “umbrella man”, picture of the “Three Tramps” who were suspected to have some involvement in the assassination, Bill and Jean Newman on the ground after allegedly hearing shots from behind them, picture of Lee Harvey Oswald holding a rifle, picture of JFK with Sukarno, picture of secret service agent George Hickey, picture of David Ferrie and Oswald; Wikipedia; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_F._Kennedy_assassination_conspiracy_theories 

-Albert Thomas winking at LBJ shortly after the assassination; National Archives and Records Administration; https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:AlbertThomasLadyBirdLBJJackieKennedyAirForce1byStoughton.jpg 

-Picture of LBJ being sworn in; Wikipedia; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_F._Kennedy_assassination_conspiracy_theories

-Vietnam War clips; PBS; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3j-3Xi5BcKs&ab_channel=PBS 

Section 4: George W. Bush, Abu Ghraib, Guantanamo Bay detention camp, Camp Whitehorse, and 9/11

-The Hooded Man image, and picture of Lynndie England holding leashed man “Gus”; Wikipedia – U.S. Government copyright; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abu_Ghraib_torture_and_prisoner_abuse 

-Lynndie England headshot; US Army; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lynndie_England

-Charles Graner punching handcuffed prisoners; Wikipedia – U.S. Government copyright; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abu_Ghraib_torture_and_prisoner_abuse 

-Charles Graner headshot; Wikipedia – U.S. Government copyright; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Graner 

-Ivan Frederick sitting on detainee; Wikipedia – U.S. Government copyright; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abu_Ghraib_torture_and_prisoner_abuse

-Ivan Frederick picture; NBC – David J. Phillip / AP; https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna21090172 

-Charles Graner and Sabrina Harman behind human pyramid of prisoners; Wikipedia – U.S. Government copyright; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abu_Ghraib_torture_and_prisoner_abuse

-Sabrina Harman headshot; Wikipedia – U.S. Government copyright; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sabrina_Harman 

-Sgt. Michael J. Smith and dog barking at prisoner; Wikipedia – U.S. Government copyright; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abu_Ghraib_torture_and_prisoner_abuse

-Sgt. Michael J. Smith headshot; NBC – Matthew S. Gunby / AP; https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna11943182 

-Force feeding restraint chair in Guantanamo, picture of detainees 1; Wikipedia – Shane T. McCoy, Brian Godette; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guantanamo_Bay_detention_camp

-Picture of detainees 2; Amnesty International – US DoD; https://www.amnesty.org.uk/guantanamo-bay-human-rights 

-Rasul v. Bush case page 1; https://tile.loc.gov/storage-services/service/ll/usrep/usrep542/usrep542466/usrep542466.pdf

-Clip of Bush walking and all 9/11 clips; EM Productions; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AwRch0-bk5A&ab_channel=EMProductions 

-Interview with George W. Bush about the treatment of Iraqi prisoners; c-span; https://www.c-span.org/program/white-house-event/presidential-interview/128007 

-Article about Clarke Paulus (Marine briefly in charge of Camp Whitehorse) being acquitted after death of prisoner; Associated Press; https://www.pressdemocrat.com/article/news/marine-acquitted-of-major-abuse-charge-in-iraqi-death/ 

-Article about Lynndie England’s 3 year sentence; The Guardian; https://www.theguardian.com/world/2005/sep/28/iraq.usa 

Flog #10

Earlier this week I was really struggling to nail down an idea for Hack #4. I ended last week with a few ambiguous ideas that I tried to clarify with some more brainstorming/storyboarding, but it wasn’t until Thursday that I was really able to commit to an idea. I’ve not had any trouble finding media sources now that I know what I’m trying to create, though I’m still a bit uncertain on how exactly I’m going to break one of the rules. I think I’ll feel better about it after I draft my artist’s statement. 

Since my theme for my remix is government conspiracy theories I am a bit concerned that my remix may come off as a bit insensitive, so I’m trying to be careful about what videos and images I pick. With all the super infamous conspiracies and their related imagery I’m trying to stick to the more well known videos and pictures since most people have already seen them, but that gets more difficult with lesser known conspiracies.

I also had a bit of trouble with the audio I am using. I was originally going to try and remix some contrasting songs together, but since I have almost no experience with DAWs and it was very difficult to try to learn, I have since decided to pick a song that is heavily sampled so that I’m remaining in the spirit of remixing.

Flog #9

I’ve been thinking about what I’m going to do for my hack. I had the idea that it would be interesting to remix songs and videos as some kind of commentary either on American politics or big corporations/monopolies. I feel like there are lots of existing songs that critique similar topics, or I could alternatively try to find songs that are in contrast with the video clips I’m using. I have a bit of experience with After Effects and Audacity so I plan on using those tools for my remix as of right now. 

I also toyed with the idea of using ai in some form of commentary on pollution and global warming, though I’m not sure if that will really work for this project since a person didn’t create what I would be remixing. If I primarily used ai I would also have to break the three distinct time periods rule, unless I managed to find ai programs from different eras (which is possible, it would just limit what sort of material I’d be working with for some portions). 

Overall I’m not really decided on what I’m going to do, so I’ll probably do some sort of test to see how well I can actually remix songs. I only have a little bit of experience with music, so if it doesn’t work out I’ll still have time to switch to an idea that’s less audio intensive. 

Flog 8

This week we talked about originality in writing and music, and what is considered ‘stealing’ or plagiarism. I really liked the comic reading, the other readings were a little more confusing but still very interesting. Before the readings this week I hadn’t heard about any of the theft accusations between different songs so that was interesting to learn about. I have very conflicted feelings about what is considered ‘theft’ according to some of the cases we looked at. I think being inspired by something and transforming parts of it to make it your own is just part of the creative process, but clearly the law thinks otherwise in some cases. 

I’ve also been thinking a little about what I’m going to do for the next hack. I haven’t done a lot of intentional remixing so I think it will be very fun. Hopefully we get some examples in class because aside from collaging or maybe some video editing I don’t think I have a broad enough view on what can be considered a ‘remix’ and I would like to see how far it can be pushed between mediums.

Flog #3

36. Does using this technology require me to think more or less?

Google Sheets definitely requires you to think more in most use cases. The way I utilized it during hack #3 was fairly mindless compared to the normal workflow one might experience while using this software. While my hack used a very limited number of tools, there are many more complex options available in Google Sheets (like basic coding, mathematical formulas, and more). Most of the use cases I see for Google Sheets are fairly complex and it is used by a lot of organizations. I can imagine Sheets or Excel are used by most major companies and political organizations for things like budgets at the very least. This does make you question the nature of organizing data in this way and how it can potentially dehumanize groups of people/organizations by reducing them to just a line on a sheet that’s being allocated a certain amount of funding or things of that nature. Google Sheets has this very clinical aura that takes a lot of the soul out of what you are doing, and in a way it almost feels like it’s encouraging you to think less critically about the things you are organizing, calculating, or projecting, though that might just be my interpretation of how the UI makes me feel. 

37. What would the world be like if everyone used this technology exactly as I use it?

It would be quite funny if everyone used this technology the way I did for my hack. It’s one of the most impractical uses of Google Sheets, and considering how many alternatives there are for animation I don’t think anyone would really use it if they could only use it that way. That being said, there are people who use tools like Sheets and Excel to make artwork. While I was browsing online for inspiration I found this person, Tatsuo Horiuchi, who makes vector-style artwork in Excel. His work is way more complex than what I made and it doesn’t even look like it’s been created in a data organizing tool. I think it’s very interesting that he creates this work in Excel, and he said in an interview that the reason he does this is because he prefers the UI of Excel over other art programs. 

Hack #3

gif

(broken image link: https://imgur.com/a/b7xP3Sz)

When I started ideating for my software invasion, I thought a lot about Steven Levy’s Hacker Ethics introduced in chapter two of Hackers: Heroes of the Computer Revolution, specifically about the belief that you can create art and beauty on computers. Levy focuses on how the software itself should be seen as an artform and it made me curious about how fairly standard software can be repurposed to create art. Going into this hack I knew I wanted to create an animation, since it requires more technical components than a still drawing and I thought most software would give more resistance to being used that way. I also knew I wanted to use a program geared towards office work, as that provides a natural contrast to animation. I started off experimenting with Google Slides, though I found that it natively has too many functions that are well suited for animation, like the slides themselves, timed transition between slides, and the primitive layer support. After some more experimentation I decided that Google Sheets would provide the most resistance and was likely the least suited for my task.

Google Sheets started off as a program called XL2Web, which as the name implies is just a web application of Excel. Both Sheets and Excel are designed for organizing data, creating charts, and performing calculations. The software itself is quite complex and it has gained a large following over the years with events like the Microsoft Excel World Championship (video), though I found that even this gamified version of Excel still has the competitors performing similar tasks to what you would do in a workplace environment. 

While Sheets does have functions that go beyond the realm of typical office applications, like inserting images and a ‘draw’ tool which can create simple vector art, the majority of the application is themed around data manipulation. The readily available options in the toolbar are things like currency formatting, tools for adjusting decimal places, chart creation, filter options, text formatting, and mathematical functions, all with simple, clean icons to match its office theme. All of these tools are not particularly helpful for most forms of art creation, though you could possibly use them for some form of ASCII art. For my animation I wanted to stick to the natural form and function of Sheets, so I used the cells and ‘fill color’ tool to create a pixel animation, instead of using the draw tool or arranging images. I used the individual sheets as my frames, and switched between them quickly using the built-in shortcut (‘alt’ + ‘pg down’ on Windows). 

Pixel art as we know it today largely originates from arcade games and 8-bit consoles in the late 70’s and 80’s (Rouse). While some see it as simply a product of the memory limitations placed on early video games, the style actually has roots in many other artforms, like tile mosaics, pointillism, cross stitch, and tapestries, which use either a grid format or congruent shapes of color to create the image. I drew inspiration from these sources when deciding what I was going to draw and chose a peaceful scene in late twilight. I also referenced some background paintings from Studio Ghibli movies for the color palette. I thought this natural scene provided a nice contrast to the rigid nature of office work, as well as to the frame of Sheets itself. The sources of inspiration I chose also stemmed from places of leisure and pleasure, which are not commonly associated with data manipulation and office work. I also didn’t want my animation to have a strong association with video games, since I felt like I could pull the piece away from technology as a whole with something more painterly.

Throughout the process of making my animation I ran into some very odd problems that you wouldn’t normally notice about Sheets. One of my most interesting issues was the frame itself and how it affected how I perceived the colors. The majority of art programs have a gray background and UI around the canvas (and artists often will color the canvas a similar gray before beginning a drawing), this is done for numerous reasons, though it is primarily to help with eyestrain and to provide a reference to ambient light and neutral saturation. For example, if you were to draw on a canvas with a white background it would be harder to achieve bright highlights than it would be on a gray background. Since I started off my pixel drawing in an art program I faced a lot of confusion when translating the drawing into Sheets. It felt like all the colors I had originally chosen were now far too dark since a lot of our vision is dependent on contrast (Spring), and Sheets has a primarily white UI on desktop. This issue alongside the color calibration difference between the monitors I had been switching between left me wondering if I should change the palette altogether to match the white background, though ultimately I left it the same since color selection is difficult in Sheets and I already had the hexadecimal codes for the current color palette. 

sketch
‘Sketch’ done in MediBang Paint

(broken image link: https://imgur.com/a/kghjnyy)

This color issue really reinforced how bad Sheets is as an art program. The white UI on its own is somewhat problematic even in a workplace environment, as it can lead to eyestrain, though it is clear that Google wants to maintain a ‘clean’ aesthetic with its software, as they all use this primarily white palette. Another really funny thing I ran into was how the piece can be displayed with inverted colors on mobile. At first I thought it had just loaded incorrectly (since it took forever to load in the app), though I realized the colors were inverted because my phone was in dark mode. This honestly took me by surprise, since even in a data manipulation project the colors may be important for finding things quickly or representing information. This further reinforces that Google Sheets isn’t built with art and color in mind.

screenshots of light mode and dark mode to show inversion

(broken image link: https://imgur.com/a/0nVLq97)

Works Cited

Steven Levy, Hackers: Heroes of the Computer Revolution (1984)

Margaret Rouse, Pixel Art (2015)

Aimi Atikah Roslan et. al., The Psychology of Grey in Painting Backgrounds (2022) (not directly referenced, but related)

Kenneth R. Spring et. al., Human Vision and Color Perception 

Flog #6

My biggest struggle this week was definitely the Design reading by Anne Balsamo. I don’t know why I found it so confusing, I think the beginning exploring all the different possible definitions of design followed by the somewhat convoluted description of design as a new liberal art just left me very confused. 

Working on my hack has also been slow going. I knew from the beginning that I wanted to make an animation and I explored doing it in PowerPoint since it has a feature to automatically go to the next slide, but I realized in class that using something like Sheets or Excel would be better since it resists being used as an art program more than PowerPoint. It also doesn’t natively have a function to automatically go between sheets on a timer like PowerPoint, and I plan on using the sheets as frames so I thought that added resistance leaned into the hack more. I need to work on the content of my artist statement as well, especially trying to tie it into some of the readings from in class.

Flog #5

Writing my artist statement for hack #2 was definitely a challenge this week, especially since WordPress is now giving me issues with the images. I ended up linking the image as well as uploading it because it wasn’t showing up at first (it appears to be there now). I also couldn’t get my post to go to the main DIG401 site with the other artist statements, I used the same tag as artist statement #1 and then I tried adding another one to match everyone else’s but for some reason it won’t send (here’s the link if you need it https://dig401.limilano.dcreate.domains/artist-statement/put-the-bullet-through-the-ceo/). The image issue started after I updated something in WordPress so maybe I need to update it again because there was a problem with the last update, it seems like others have had problems with uploading images as well. 

I don’t have many ideas for hack #3 yet but I was thinking about doing something with either creating an animation in something like Google Slides or using a video game like Terraria for something unexpected. 

The reading for Thursday made me realize that I might have been able to make my Oregon Trail idea work if I’d found another editor for BASIC instead of trying to use FreeBasic. I didn’t try to find another one since the download of the game I found said to use FreeBasic in its ReadMe, but since it’s written in BASIC I may have been able to use any BASIC editor I could find. I wish I’d thought to try that sooner, but I guess I might be able to do something with it for hack #5. 

Actually as I was going to post this my WordPress said it needs to update, so we’ll see how that goes…

Put the Bullet Through the CEO

Image of my game

(Image not displaying link: https://dig401.limilano.dcreate.domains/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/IMG_4539-2-scaled.jpg)

For Hack #2 I decided to focus on the interventionist strategies ‘reskinning’ and ‘rewriting’ introduced by Mary Flanagan in Critical Play: Radical Game Design, as well as engaging with the concept of ‘folk ambivalence’ described by Whitney Phillips and Ryan M. Milner. The game I have chosen to reskin is the classic children’s game Pin the Tail on the Donkey. This nostalgic party game is simple: the objective is to stick a ‘tail’, usually a sticker, onto the rump of a donkey poster while wearing a blindfold. 

In the original game, the person who is closest to the natural position of the tail wins; however, my reskin of the game adds a twist to the rules. Drawing from recent memes and pop culture, the ‘donkey’ is now the former CEO of UnitedHealthcare, Brian Thompson, and the ‘tail’ is a red ‘x’ indicating where the player has shot. Unlike the original game, you now have two choices when placing your shot. You can either try to aim for the two red crosshairs on the drawing of Thompson, effectively killing him, or intentionally miss. Either way, your shot may hit one of the many innocent civilians behind him in the scene. I did this to illustrate the potential unintended consequences of assassinations that are often ignored. For example, in July 2024 the assassination attempt on Donald Trump in Pennsylvania resulted in two people in the crowd being shot and critically injured, and both were in the hospital for more than 10 days. 

These unintended victims often have a smaller presence in the news cycle, though they are extremely common. A 2023 study found that “pediatric firearm injuries are the leading cause of death among American children” and that “72% of victims were shot outdoors by an unknown shooter, the motivation of which was unknown in 93% of cases. 36% of these shootings were “drive-by” ” (Bernardin et al.). By placing Thompson outside of a school, a place he could have been as he did have kids, I include the potential of gun violence against children in the game. 

I picked this specific shooting due to the public reaction it received. Similar to the Columbine example Phillips and Milner discuss, Thompson’s killer quickly gained ‘folk ambivalence’, as people were both outraged and excited about the assassination. The level of engagement and memeification it received quickly amplified the public reaction, directly inspiring Riley English’s attempted assassination of billionaire investor Scott Bessent in Washington, D.C. (Kunzelman). While her assassination attempt wasn’t successful, it illustrates how the memeification of events like Thompson’s assassination can lead to both folk ambivalence and amplification of public opinion. I wanted to express this in the silly way my game is presented. The clear objective created by the red crosshairs and somewhat funny title make it feel like a joke on the surface, but once you take the setting into account the full gravity of what many have been picking fun at is realized. 

Flanagan’s concept of reskinning played a major role in my game, as I changed all the visuals that are typical to Pin the Tail on the Donkey. I did this to subvert your expectations of how you’re going to feel playing the game, as unlike the original my game encourages you not to play it at all. The macabre setting of the game also rewrites the rules, as some may be inclined to intentionally try not to hit Thompson, which is the opposite objective of the original game. The setting could also inspire cognitive friction with what is considered a ‘justified’ killing, if Thompson had been shot outside of a school while picking up his kids instead of on the street would the public reaction have been the same? 

Sources Cited

Mary Bernardin et al., Child Firearm Injury Circumstances and Associations With Violence Intervention Program Enrollment (2023)

Mary Flanagan, Critical Play: Radical Game Design (2009)

Michael Kunzelman, Mass. woman arrested at Capitol said she was inspired by CEO slaying, prosecutors say (2025)

Whitney Phillips and Ryan M. Milner, The Ambivalent Internet: Mischief, Oddity, and Antagonism Online (2017)

Flog #4

I’ve really been struggling with hack #2 this week. I downloaded a bunch of open source games to see if I could find a way to edit them, and I’ve only had failures. I originally wanted to reskin Oregon Trail, and I found multiple versions where you could download the source code, but to actually run and edit it you needed to use FreeBasic… I tried to get this to work on my computer using several tutorials but it just wouldn’t run. My idea was to change Oregon Trail to have a woman primarily travelling (instead of a whole family like the original game), and show the unique struggles a lone woman or single mother would have encountered in that situation. 

I also tried to download an online Battleship game, and change it so that you’re playing as the government attacking refugee boats (this would either be revealed at the end or after you sink the first boat), but I couldn’t figure out how to edit that either. This idea also wouldn’t really work for the boardgame version of Battleship, so I had to change to something else.

Before completely giving up on the game idea I downloaded another game from the person who created Passage, Cultivation, to see if it was set up the same way, but I found out that he doesn’t always structure the games in a way that’s easy to make changes to so I got stuck again. There were also a lot of games on Itch.io where you could pay to get the source code, but I didn’t want to risk buying a game I couldn’t edit so I decided not to pursue that.

I finally decided to make an analog game, so I got the supplies to create my final game idea. I think this one is going to tie into the reading we did on Tuesday a lot better than my other ideas, so hopefully my artist statement is more robust than my last one.