Animated Gifs


Warning: Undefined array key 0 in /home/digitald/public_html/courses/wp-content/plugins/radgeek-FWP---Add-Attribution-70acf52/add-attribution-feedwordpress.php on line 363

Fandom Gif

Example

Counter – Example

Analysis

The former gif shows The Doctor from Doctor Who exiting his time-traveling, teleporting phone-booth, the “TARDIS.” To many fans, the TARDIS is a cultural and significant element to the show, acting as an integral part of the Doctor’s adventures. The gif itself could signify the beginning of a new era in the show and act as a way for fans to transition from one Doctor to the next. In my counter-gif, it is a comedic remake of Doctor Who which utilizes many nonsensical elements that undermines the meaning of the TARDIS. The parody makes fun the TARDIS’s use and the show’s science-fiction plot by remediating it into a musical.

Sports Gif

Example

Counter – Example

Analysis

Sports gifs are primarily used to condense the highlights of games and matches into shorter clips. The clip above shows Lebron James’s athletic skills and competitive demeanor as he dunks a basketball over an opponent’s head during a game. The counter-gif shows a man that is the opposite of Lebron physically and emotionally. The gif shows an overweight man hilariously failing to dunk a basketball even with the help of a trampoline. In contrast to the Lebron gif, the man is not taking the dunk seriously and does not display the physical prowess that Lebron has. The counter-gif acts a comedic antithesis and downplays the intensity of a basketball game.

Reaction Gif

Example

Counter – Example

Analysis:

The first gif is Rick Grimes from The Walking Dead shaking weakly and staring blankly ahead. To fans, the gif shows a scene after a particularly traumatic and emotional experience that the protagonist had just gone through. To those unfamiliar with the show, it still depicts a scene of exhaustion and desperation. By adding a fake context in the form of subtitles to the counter-gif, I effectively strip away the context of the show and implemented a humorous one. By comparing the physical exhaustion of a man in a zombie apocalypse to one of a college student after finals, the gif displays both cultural knowledge and becomes relatable to a wider audience.

Posted from our fascination by Tony N.

Lab #3: Gifs


Warning: Undefined array key 0 in /home/digitald/public_html/courses/wp-content/plugins/radgeek-FWP---Add-Attribution-70acf52/add-attribution-feedwordpress.php on line 363

Reaction Gifs:

Reaction gifs are the most common form of gifs because they are able to be used easily to convey a message. The gif I have chosen above is most often used to show displeasure or just disappoint in someone’s actions in a comical way. It successfully brings out these emotions, while the second gif of Terrell Suggs on the Ravens shares no emotion or reaction. This second gif is a counter example of the reaction gif because it shows no reaction while the first gif clearly conveys an emotional message.

Sports Gifs:

Sports gifs are fairly self-explanatory because they simply feature sports clips to create a response from the viewer. Whether it’s an exceptional play, like the gif above, or an athlete making a mistake, sports gifs are able to get a reaction. Sports gifs are generally used to highlight the greatest plays made by athletes in their sports but occasionally they are used to show bad plays and the subsequent disappoint by the player’s teammates, adding to its humor. The gif I used for my counter example is a clip from The Intern showing a group of people playing Quidditch. It’s simply showing non-professional athletes playing a game that is not really considered a sport at this point which counters the professionalism in most sports gifs.

Fandom Gifs:

Fandom gifs are quick clips of movies that show an iconic moment or a memorable quote. These are extremely popular for people to use to show their favorite movies and to use those moments for a satirical purpose in life. Since fandom gifs only use a quick clip like the one from Goodfellas above, I used a gif where every Star Wars movie ever made are embedded into one gif as my counter example. I used this as my counter example because it does not focus on one particular part, but puts every movie together in a jumbled mess.

Posted from My blog by Charlie

Intro to Digital Studies 2017-09-29 14:02:42


Warning: Undefined array key 0 in /home/digitald/public_html/courses/wp-content/plugins/radgeek-FWP---Add-Attribution-70acf52/add-attribution-feedwordpress.php on line 363

Reaction GIF

via GIPHY

Reaction gif’s are a way for individuals to react to statements, opinions, events, etc. They allow users to convey emotions through an animated image. Conventionally, as seen in the first image, reaction gifs contain an individual’s entire face. This provides more context and makes the emotion the gif is conveying clear. Taking this convention into mind, I decided to focus on one small part of the face in my counterexample. By zooming in and focusing on a small part of the face, viewers lose some of the context. This allows for a broader range of potential interpretations. Shock is the obvious emotion being conveyed in the first gif. However, when we take the same action (a blink) and zoom in, suddenly the gif could be attempting to convey various emotions. The second gif illustrates that a blink could mean any variety of things including shock, boredom, tiredness, etc. The unspoken convention of including the entire face acts to provide context and streamline interpretation.

Cinemagraph

via GIPHY

Cinemagraphs are a version of gifs where only one aspect of the image moves. It is commonly associated with being artistic, grand, or classy. In recent years it has become a popular technique for advertisers as illustrated by the first photo. This image utilizes cinemagraphs to advertise hairspray by having a model’s hair blow in the wind. The image appears very high class and artistic. The counterexample we created only as one part of the image, the drool, moving which classifies it as a cinemagraph. However, the photo has a comedic or even crude effect causing it to deviate from the normal use of a cinemagraph. By changing the purpose of the image we are critiquing the purpose and challenging the artistic or even pretentious connotation surrounding cinemagraphs.

Sports GIF

via GIPHY

Sports gifs are known for displaying the most intense plays, epic fails, or entertaining reactions. The first image shows an intense catch resulting in a touchdown and embodies this category of gifs typical use. In our counterexample, we decided to create a parody of this category by making a sports gif in which nothing happens. In the second image, you can see the players from Oregon and Kansas prepare for play to start and then we can assume a whistle is blown, despite not having audio, all of the players stand up and start wandering around. The anticlimactic nature of this gif acts as a critique to sports gifs.

Posted from Intro to Digital Studies by Kat

DIG101 2017-09-25 10:17:22


Warning: Undefined array key 0 in /home/digitald/public_html/courses/wp-content/plugins/radgeek-FWP---Add-Attribution-70acf52/add-attribution-feedwordpress.php on line 363

In What is a File?, the authors mention the need to find different means to store data and files. A constant problem many of us face with our computers and mobile phones, is overflowing the storage capacity of the device and not having enough storage space. However, people have already come up with some platforms that act as hard-drive disk for much of our electronic ‘baggage’.

Dropbox, is a file hosting service, owned by Dropbox Inc., and is used by more than 500 million people, with an annual revenue of 1 billion dollars, since it first started 10 years ago. Dropbox was founded by two MIT students,  Drew Houston and Arash Ferdowsi,  in 2007 as a startup company.

An early photo of Dropbox cofounders Houston and Arash Ferdowsi. By Drew Houston.

Drew Houston actually came up with the idea of Dropbox while on the Chinatown bus going from Boston to New York. He, once again, had forgotten his thumb drive (USB), and decided to take out his frustration by starting to write new code which later turned out to be the beginning of Dropbox.

After posting an intro video for Dropbox, his now co-founder Arash Ferdowsi, randomly happened to see it on Hackers News, which made him email Houston with the idea of working together. This was perfect timing as Houston needed a cofounder in order to be funded by Y Combinator, a seed accelerator owned by Silicon Valley legend Paul Graham.

After just one meeting with Houston at the MIT student center, Arash Ferdowsi decides to drop out of school with only one semester left and join Houston in creating Dropbox.

Dropbox Logo. 

After a weird meeting in a rug shop and and a party for iLike (an early music startup by Facebook) the two new cofounders saw their funding go from $60 to $1.2 million in just one click of the refresh button.

After a couple demo videos online and an offer by Steve Jobs himself to by the company, Dropbox turned out to be ranked as one of the most valuable startups, not only in the US, but also in the world. At the time Dropbox was valued at over 10 billion dollars.

Even though I’m not a big user of Dropbox, it is definitely a tool that is very useful for anyone that has more than one photo on his or her phone or computer. Dropbox makes our lives much easier by storying anything we need without taking up space on our own devices but also by being able to access these files and data from anywhere in the world.

 

 

Bibliography

Mazarakis, Alyson Shontell and Anna. “Dropbox Founder Reveals How He Built a $10 Billion Company in His 20s – Even Though Steve Jobs Told Him Apple Would Destroy It.” Business Insider, Business Insider, 12 June 2017, www.businessinsider.com/dropbox-founder-and-ceo-drew-houston-interview-2017-6.

“Y Combinator (Company).” Wikipedia, Wikimedia Foundation, 23 Sept. 2017, en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Y_Combinator_(company).

 

 

Posted from DIG101 by Danae

The Finality of Flash Files


Warning: Undefined array key 0 in /home/digitald/public_html/courses/wp-content/plugins/radgeek-FWP---Add-Attribution-70acf52/add-attribution-feedwordpress.php on line 363

In the article we read for class, the authors spoke about two concepts which really resonated with me. The first of these was the notion of the idea of ‘delete’ as once files are opened up for sharing, there is no outer boundary and the file can, in theory, live forever. The second concept that grabbed my attention was the idea of file formats being conceived as a response to what users sought to do with their data. I find this idea of a data type as a response to consumer needs fascinating, as file types themselves, unlike the files themselves, can fall out of vogue and seemingly disappear.

Throughout reading this article, I thought about Adobe’s announcement back in July about phasing their phasing out of Flash. Flash sometimes referred to as .swf’s were a very popular file type found in web development across the net. Over the past few years, as internet users have demanded faster loading and better quality video in-browser, HTML5 has become the dominant online video format. Unlike Flash, it doesn’t require third-party plug-ins, which to slow down a user’s browser.

RIP Flash :'(

Adobe announced they will no longer creating new features for Flash as part of the beginning of a phasing out of the popular plugin. I find this fascinating in relation to the article because of the two concepts of file immortality and file type development that I previously mentioned. Eventually, Adobe will stop offering security updates for Flash, which will effectively make it inoperable for most users. There are tons of animations, games, and other assets that are stored in .swf’s. Soon, preserving our ability to engage with these files on modern devices and preserve them for the next generation will be the responsibility of the passionate homebrew communities which have fortunately formed around file types like Flash.

Sources:

Get ready to finally say goodbye to Flash — in 2020

https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/MSR-TR-2011-109.pdf

Posted from My blog by Will H.

Data and Filing


Warning: Undefined array key 0 in /home/digitald/public_html/courses/wp-content/plugins/radgeek-FWP---Add-Attribution-70acf52/add-attribution-feedwordpress.php on line 363

With increasing development of computers and filing systems, people are now able to store massive amounts of data with ease. Data today is exponentially cheaper than it was compared with when computers were first introduced in the 1980’s. In an article on mkomo.com, the cost of data per Gigabyte was just under one million dollars but, compared to 2010, the cost of data per Gigabyte has dropped to less than ten cents. This massive drop in cost per Gig has created a necessity for hard drives that are able to hold enormous amounts of data and new systems within the hard drives that allow the user to access information quickly. With data becoming so cheap, it became critical that technology catch up to be able to handle so much information.

Representation of the rapidly declining cost of data since 1980. Courtesy of www.mkomo.com.

With the capacity to store exponentially more data than could be done in the past, computer scientists must make sure that the data collected does not disappear due to a crashed computer. In the article “What is a File?” the authors state that because computers can fail “in part” and “in totality,” “data within this system are so arranged that if part of them is destroyed or even the whole, this event does not catastrophically affect the system’s functioning, its utility.” This necessity to create systems that are able to not only store data but also retain it in case of a total system failure. “Filing” has evolved over time, just as data has, and it will continue to be adjusted to fit the need at the time.

Bibliography:

https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/MSR-TR-2011-109.pdf

http://www.mkomo.com/cost-per-gigabyte

 

Posted from My blog by Charlie

The Insecurity that surrounds “Files”


Warning: Undefined array key 0 in /home/digitald/public_html/courses/wp-content/plugins/radgeek-FWP---Add-Attribution-70acf52/add-attribution-feedwordpress.php on line 363

To be completely honest, the article “What is a File?” really confused me. What exactly do the researchers mean by saying the word “file” is an abstraction. I did not follow this very well.

There was one idea, however, that really stuck out to me, because I felt like I could easily relate to it. In the article, it states: ‘… they used to have a desire to put a file “on a CD” so that “it could be safe.” But they go on to say that this is hard to do in the context of Cloud storage’ (9). I think this is true for many people when it comes to thinking about “files,” especially now in the era of the “Cloud.” There is an insecurity attached to “files” because they are not physically there, but just data in a system. This questions ownership. Who owns these files? The user, or the system creator/manager? What happens if the system suddenly breaks down? Where are all the “files?” Are they protected? Can they be stolen through the Cloud system?

These are just some of the questions that, at least, for me, come to mind when I think of saving a “file” especially with the Cloud. People find a sense of security in backing up their “files” on a physical hard drive or CD, because ownership is clear, and there is no system that could crash or hack information. It feels more concrete. Below is a picture of the kind of hard drive I use to back up all my “files,” in case something were to happen to my computer. It is the Seagate Expansion.

Picture Source 

Every so often I like to just stick this hard drive into my computer and back up all of my files. Yes, they are all backed up in the “Cloud,” but this hard drive makes me feel more secure not only in the insurance that my files will never be deleted or gone forever, but I know that I own them this way.

Posted from Digital Studies 101 Blog by Lindsay

Freeze! Give me the passcode to your phone


Warning: Undefined array key 0 in /home/digitald/public_html/courses/wp-content/plugins/radgeek-FWP---Add-Attribution-70acf52/add-attribution-feedwordpress.php on line 363

Recently, there was an article titled “The new electronic police state” that spoke about a person’s encounter with the customs and border patrol agent. He was asked for the passcode to his phone and within minutes, it was scanned for “deraogatory” information. This is related to the section of our reading in which the study explains how users defined ownership of a file. When I thought of “owning” a file, I thought privacy. The “files” on my phone should stay private as they are my thoughts, ideas, and words that I do not feel the need to share. Just like our own subconscious thoughts, they should not be subject to searches at the airport.

As the article states, current policies allow travelers to be “coerced into allowing access to their private information without any suspicion of violating any immigration laws.” If our phones are easy targets for searches and information to our private life, then soon, when technology allows, our brains will become public information. When the time comes that our subconscious and conscious thoughts are interpreted in to “files” and data — a literal perspective seen in this picture of Spongebob

 

An episode of Spongebob in which his brain is depicted into an office full of files as memories.

 

— then who is to stop them from doing these immoral searches. If our conscious, written thoughts are allowed to be accessed, will we come to a point where we ask: Do we even own our “subconscious” files?

Posted from Digital 101 by Christy

Who pays for Instagram shares?


Warning: Undefined array key 0 in /home/digitald/public_html/courses/wp-content/plugins/radgeek-FWP---Add-Attribution-70acf52/add-attribution-feedwordpress.php on line 363
Instagram conversation between photographer Max Dubler and the owner of a small longboard brand.

In today’s reading, it discussed the evolution of physical and digital ownership in context of social media and the Cloud. Previously, a personal photo or work is considered to be the property of the owner until there is a given contract or agreement. However, in the case of social media, many apps such as Instagram find a loophole by being able to utilize personal content without claiming ownership.

But what does it mean if someone else on the app uses your photo?

In the above conversation, photographer and skateboarder, Max Dublin attempts to get a company that shared his photo (with proper credit) to pay him for using his work on their Instagram page. A lengthy exchange goes down in the DMs with the brand claiming that they gave him credit and that it gave him exposure. Dublin retorts that taking down his photo is meaningless as the intellectual value of his property has already been seen by many others. The argument ends with the small brand telling Dublin to “go extort someone else.”

This argument brings up the question of how the ownership of your property is translated when it is projected through a different medium, in this case, Instagram. In Instagram’s agreement policies, Instagram has the ability to use and sell your photos without consent or paying you. Yet, Dublin’s work was not stolen by the parent company, but instead, another user. Would the same rules and regulations apply?

The reading states that many people often don’t know where their property end up. What would have happened if the brand hadn’t tagged Dublin and gave him credit? Am I infringing on Dublin’s property by including his screenshots in this post? Ownership in the context of contemporary technological world is something that definitely needs to be reworked and established in order to set future standards.

Posted from our fascination by Tony N.

Define Delete


Warning: Undefined array key 0 in /home/digitald/public_html/courses/wp-content/plugins/radgeek-FWP---Add-Attribution-70acf52/add-attribution-feedwordpress.php on line 363

I was particularly intrigued by a quote on page three of “What is a File?.” The authors state: “It is important to bear in mind that all of this work, all these doings are not necessarily seen or understood by users.” The idea that users do not completely understand the inner workings of files or technology at large became more compelling to me when coupled with the example of deletion. What happens when users “delete” a file, particularly when it has already been uploaded to social media sites?

https://imgflip.com/i/ygk1f

This meme illustrates the difficulty in deleting Facebook, or photos from it, that users experience. Photo from: https://imgflip.com/i/ygk1f

In 2012, a Venture Beat article was released revealing that deleting a photo on Facebook did not permanently get rid of the photo. When a user clicks delete, the photo disappears from their album and profile. However, if someone had copied the direct link to that photo it is still easily accessible. This means that until the photo is directly wiped from Facebook’s servers, it is still available for not only those with access to the server but the general public. The article did not mention how often Facebook wipes or updates their server to permanently delete these files. However, the authors were able to find photos that users had deleted in 2008 or four years before the article was published.

This illustrates a discrepancy between what users believe delete means and how those who engineered the technology define the word. Much like the word “file”, deletion in this context acts as a boundary object between users and computer scientists. The paper defines failure of a boundary objects as the inability of both sides to “get on with their concerns.” (page 4) This boundary can break down when users believe they deleted something from an online platform but it could come back to affect them later. This is increasingly relevant as privacy concerns become a widely debated topic.

Posted from Intro to Digital Studies by Kat