The Final Reflective Post

Throughout the course and my trends of blog posts, I notice that I concentrate typically on smart technology and relate these 21st century trends (i.e. smart cars, smart phones, smart fiction technology in Black Mirror) to their unnoticed danger. It’s interesting to notice that I find technology to be one of the coolest things in society today, however it’s one of the most dangerous things we encounter from day to day life.  When rereading my blog posts, I write about how there’s no positive thing about these smart devices, and say nothing of the benefits each have. I kept up with this trend throughout the entire semester, and it’s interesting to take note that there were no variations in my posts, and every single one was concentrated on the terrifying dangers technology has.

When relating this online trend to everyday reality, the only thing I physically talk about when regarding technology is how incredibly amazing our creators and inventors are today.  One would never think I only advocate against technology and the creations made online on these blog posts. There was one quote by my blog post regarding Black Mirror’s “Be Right Back” episode that overall summarizes my thoughts and ideas when regarding to online blog posts. To revisit the post, this episode allows a woman who lost her husband in a texting-and-driving car crash to bring him back to life with technology; “Technology was the reason the husband died and simultaneously the only reason he was able to live again.” This is very powerful, as my entire take on technology reflects within this quote that I made a couple months back.

Overall, my blog posts have followed trends behind one another, and have opened my eyes to the severe dangers that the public isn’t aware of until they diver deeper into the subjects.  Society and innovators tend to turn a blind eye to the crucial creations that could end up causing more harm to us than good.

Deadly Liabilities

While reading the infamous death of the 40 year old man dying in a self-driving car accident starts to raise questions about the technology that is supposedly to be used to make driving safer. While incidents like these arises with this new type of technology, it starts to come down to liability issues of who really killed the driver, whose to blame, and why.  One of the more interesting things I’ve been analyzing is how a traumatic accident like this is supposedly “positive” for Tesla and it’s outlook on these types of cars.  According to After Probing Tesla’s Crash, Feds Say Yay to Safe Driving, this crash was not a negative experience for their company, but rather a beneficial one.  He mentions how with this crash bringing attention to self-driving, it emphasizes the stats of how rare this occurrence is, as well as looking at the safety this car still has in comparison to regular automated cars. Yes, Tesla may be facing this legally but why should they be worried?

Allowing for this crash to help the company and economical status rather than bring attention to the possible danger that this technology has takes away from the fact that this man who died was essentially a money booster, rather than a genuine human.  People are concentrating on the idea of money and power and taking away the fact that an innocent sole died because of the inaccuracy of a technological product.  With this in mind, who should ethically be the one to blame, the driver for putting on self-driving mode, or the car company who actually had the technology that malfunctioned the car?

Personal Encounters with Facebook Trolls and Death

I never knew the extent to how hurtful Facebook Trolling could be until I encountered this activity on my recent Facebook feed.  Due to privacy and intimate reasons, I will not reveal the name of the deceased person nor the troll, but rather I’d want to explain more about this experience, and the immaturity strangers online have about the mourning of a dead person.

While learning about Facebook trolls in classes previously, I realized how important it was to understand the online memorials and how sentimental they are to the owners of the accounts. However, the idea of this type of memorial according to “Enter the Grief Police”, one of our readings from class, makes death feel cheap and artificial rather than genuine and really apart of our lives. By furthering this concept even with trolls on Facebook, it fabricates the death for not only the family, but those who are encountering the memorial and have a connection to the loved one who may have passed away.  With this in mind, my experience reading the comments was very fabricated to say the least.

Online, the husband of the loved one who had passed kindly had asked everyone to respect his space as he takes in the hard events that had just passed. Naturally people are still going to comment and post in remembrance of his wife, but there happened to be more elaborate posts from random unanimous users describing about how she was meant to die, she did deserve the events that happened to her, etc.  Fortunately, like the regulations read in class for Facebook deaths, accounts, and trolling on their Help page, the comments were immediately flagged and deleted by Facebook. Though these comments may be eliminated by the social media network, those words and thoughts will never leave the family’s heads, making the mourning processes even harder to recover.

In this circumstance, an online memorial was purposely pushed away by the husband to avoid such comments, but the trolls on Facebook are still present within the Facebook community. This accentuates the idea that online memorials are becoming more relied on for deaths, as well as the idea that there are still people out on social media trying to rupture the entirety of the mourning process, as well as break the community of this loved one down. Below you can click on the example similar to the one I experienced recently with Facebook:

Image result for facebook trolls on online memorials  

“Internet/Facebook Trolls.” The UK & Ireland Database, 22 Sept. 2013.

Digital Afterlife Presence of Cave Hill Cemetery

Throughout the studying and photographing of Cave Hill Cemetery in downtown Louisville, Kentucky, I realized that the graves within this legendary cemetery were the closest thing for the dead to still remain alive for those who would come and visit.  Cave Hill is known for the prestigious and life-like statues and memorials for those buried there.  When visiting this national landmark in my hometown, I realized that capturing the photos of those almost “living” statues made the dead feel alive.  Seeing the faces, pictures, and house-like structures for these graves made me think those buried were waiting to be let out and just needed someone to show others that they’re still alive.  With this in mind, capturing the most eloquent statues and adding a life-like movement, such as glitches, to these photographs allows for the audience to feel as though the dead are moving their own picture that was captured of them.  It adds a depth that the dead want to show the living that they’re very much alive, so to further this dimension I compiled all the glitched images into an Instagram page called “TheLivingCaveHillCemetery.”

Within this Instagram page, it is seen as if it is controlled by a single dead soul whose afterlife presence is controlling the narrations of the captions.  As the audience is observing the main overview of the account on Instagram, there are exactly twenty photos, twenty signifying the date August 20th of 2008, the date where the cemetery was officially recognized and finished after all of the renovations and corrections.  Though this cemetery was finished being built in 1913, I felt as though the exact date of when final renovations were completed was more significant for death within the digital realm, bettering the application of technological concepts. The profile picture is left blank, to add more anonymity and an eerie presence for the audience that keeps them wondering who really is narrating the stories on the page. This concept also works hand in hand with the idea of no title or “name” for the account.  Usually for an Instagram account, a user creates an @ handle, as well as a name for the account on the side (people would normally put names within this space, where it is bolded and clearly shown who runs the account on the overview of the page).  By adding the concept of no name, it emphasizes the anonymity concept even further.  Underneath the description of the page, there is a link that directly brings the user to the Find A Grave website, a website that allows people to search for a buried loved one in specifically Cave Hill Cemetery.  I added this to allow for people to really connect with those who are buried in this area, and further adds a living element to the dead who are “taking over” the page.

When scrolling through the feed of the page, every single post is a glitched black and white photograph accompanied by a caption that explains how the statue or grave is representing the rest of the afterlife presence within the cemetery.  The black and white significance allows the user to focus on the graveyard/grave rather than the distracting colors surrounding it.  As for the glitch, the randomized and almost lifelike touching of the photograph adds an element of life, as well as interaction with the dead person or “statue” being photographed.  When originally taking the photographs, I wanted others to see my vision of the environment around me.  As Susan Sontag writes in her book On Photography,

A photograph is not just the result of an encounter between an event and a photographer; picture-taking is an event within itself… While real people are out there killing themselves or other real people, the photographer stays behind the camera, creating a tiny element of another world: the image-world that bids to outlast us all (11).

With this said, by taking into consideration the lens of the photographer and the importance of their interpretation of the event occurring, a photograph will never die and will continuously live on.  This was the intention of the glitching, to keep the life-like appearance “living on” and continuously haunting the photograph on a digital level.  I programmed a line of code to generate any picture inputted into a glitched piece of art, considering the thousands of different combinations that glitching effects can add.

The captions that are narrated with each post explain the situation of where the statues are placed and what the context or action they are displaying is.  In addition, the location of every single post is the same: Cave Hill Cemetery & Arboretum.  The captions contain first person descriptions, as well as always end with the word “here,” emphasizing the location that is posted with the post as well.  Having the simultaneous addition of the location and the captions seeming as though they’re being narrated right from Cave Hill allows the audience to feel “haunted” by this dead soul right on their phone.  Adding a dimension of place and linking it to the context of the post ties in the element of aura being constructed around one’s technological device they’re viewing Instagram on.  As Zane Verdina writes in A Picture is Worth A Thousand Words: Storytelling with Instagram,

A photograph is fossilized light, and its aura of superior evidential efficacy… therefore provides a way proclaim success and to preserve them. For each individual these are “good moments” which are transformed into “good memories” (33).

In this context, these photographs within this page “transform” the aura of a simple photo from a moment into a memory.  With the caption, glitching effect, and location all combined into each post, this moment taken at this cemetery is instantly deepened into an experience, as the audience feels as though they’re reading a live caption update about the dead souls represented as statues, and emphasize that no matter how much time passes by, they will always be haunting and bring life to their photos of them as long as they’re buried at Cave Hill cemetery.

When the audience scrolls through each intimate caption, each one uses verbs such as “us,” “they,” and “he/she” in all but one post.  There’s one post that pictures the top portion of a cross, as well as a small photograph attached for the girl who had passed.  This post uses “my,” as in referring to herself in the first person.  While the other posts were more narrations of what was happening in the afterlife community around her, I wanted to add an extra element with the post that I personally think haunts the feed the most.  Pictured is a younger, beautiful girl named Stephanie, and by allowing the audience to put a name with a dead face and a grave further explains my entirety of the project and feeling connected and haunted with the movement of the dead.  Because she is so young and the only post where users can see a human face, it feels as though she should still be alive and should be living her life with any other young adult on social media platforms.  That’s why, in this case, I formed this particular post so users can imagine the face behind whose supposedly running this account.  This particular element made me think of the article “Taken from Life: The Unsettling Art of Death Photography” by Bethan Bell.  The main of the article identifies how in the Victorian ages, though kids and older relatives would pass away, in remembrance of them there would still be pictures with their dead body alongside the rest of the live family.  This same idea is displayed with a high-quality picture of this dead young girl on a grave.  It brings the same haunted aura to the viewer, realizing that this person is no longer with us, and there is all but a picture of her left on her grave above her dead body.  Christian Metz also associates his article “Photography and Fetish” along the concepts of death staying alive within a simple screenshot.  He writes,

Photography is linked with death in many different ways.  The most immediate and explicit is the social practice of keeping photographs in memory of loved beings who are no longer alive… We appear to be changing through a photographic mirror overtime appearing ageless as we go, however those who are dead will always remain within the boundaries of this mirror for us to remember them by (Metz, 84).

This links in with the connection of death within my Instagram page and how every photograph is essentially a mirror that reflects the last image seen of this loved one, leaving a “glitched” mark on those who view it.

With all of this in mind, the idea of a haunted media page within the Cave Hill Cemetery adds depth and dimension within the realm of death photography.  This concept allows for the user to feel as though the afterlife presence of the dead being is wanting them to see their lively movement, or glitching, while on this online page.  It’s as though the soul is communicating to the main profile on this account, Stephanie, to narrate what event or scene is occurring within someone’s photo. This act of communicating between the digital dead and through the user behind the screen is an element that links death in the digital age to the physical dead themselves.

Works Cited

Bell, Bethan. “Taken from Life: The Unsettling Art of Death Photography.” BBC News, BBC, 5 June 2016, www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-36389581.

Metz, Christian. Photography and Fetish. MIT Press. Volume 34, https://www.jstor.org/stable/778490.

Sontag, Susan. On Photography. Penguin Books, 1977.

Verdina, Zane.  “A Picture is Worth a Thousand Words: Storytelling with Instagram.” Universiteit Antwerpen, 2013.

 

Shut up and Dance with The Woman in the Window

Contemporary horror takes its shape in many different elements throughout many novels, videogames, movies, or even series.  Though many episodes and novels may differ, when one digs deeper into their underlying meaning, they can find the many theoretical similarities that lie amongst the two differing pieces.  In this case, I am comparing an A. J. Finn novel titled The Woman in the Window to an episode of Black Mirror titled Shut Up and Dance, relating both of these to each other and the technical uses of contemporary horror in each. Both of these works share many theoretical concepts such as focusing on the anonymous self, separate approaches to the severity of technology, and how the audience is trapped in endless decision making.

A.J. Finn’s The Woman in the Window focuses the story on a woman who is diagnosed with agoraphobia, meaning she is too ill and too traumatized to step outside.  The only way she can cope with her diagnosis is using her camera to take pictures in her house as well as the neighbors across the street.  When one day she is spying on her neighbors through her professional camera, she witnesses an event that she regrets ever seeing: murder.  Throughout the novel, you see the woman develop as a character, still relying her image on technology, and having her camera be the difference between life and death.  By incorporating this eerie habit of constantly watching others from a camera, as well as the idea that the main character has a mental illness, almost makes the reader feel bad for what she has to be going through.  Therefore, the audience can’t distinguish if she’s really doing the right or wrong thing.  As Stephen Prince mentions in his book The Horror Film, dread and anxiety are the leading psychological pushes in horror films.  For example, we dread the idea of phones and computers dying and have anxiety if this takes place.  Thus, the moment that A. J. Finn introduces the main character having developed a disease prominent in the real world, the audience then understands her habit as many people today are attached to technology like she is and dread the thought of losing it.  Just as she sees it as a release, the audience sees technology as a release too.

The Woman in the Window has the main character coping with her agoraphobia by connecting with an online community who are experiencing the same hardships that she is.  While online, she exposes her true self and all of her secrets to an online friend named “GrannyLizzie” that ends up making the difference in her later life or death situation.  This is important because it the idea of the anonymous self generates the sudden questioning if having online profiles is helping or hurting users.  It’s essential to understand how A. J. Finn takes notice of the dangers of unknown identities online; though exposing information may not be killing us now, it may literally kill us in the long run.  This form of psychological horror is gradual and takes time to develop in the novel, as the audience is slowly watching from an outsider’s perspective a daily activity becoming a danger to an ordinary person.Related image

Black Mirror‘s Shut Up and Dance centers the storyline on a teenage boy who spends most of his time on his laptop.  While one evening he is tempted by his loneliness, he then masturbates to children’s porn, all while his laptop is open and the camera is unknowingly on.  He then gets a text, saying that someone has been watching him and threatens to send his information everywhere unless he finishes specific tasks. Throughout the episode, he realizes this anonymous controller has hacked many people’s secrets and is blackmailing them as well, just like the kid, with what these individuals have exposed through technology.  In between tasks (after completed), the anonymous figure texts the main character, saying if what he did was the right thing and then moves on to the next task.  An example of one task is robbing a bank and returning the money to another individual caught in the blackmailing. Another example was the first person to kill each other wins and moves on to the next task.  Technology in this case is literally the difference between survival and death, having the “player” control either if they were to complete the task and move on forcibly or not and get exposed.  The audience therefore feels empathy, as the kid encounters this an irregular temptation, gets the thing that is most feared to others done to him.  People don’t know whether to feel uneasy about the tasks, root for him, or want him dead for the disturbing things he has done.

The dominant type of danger in this episode derives from online communities and the anonymous self, which work hand in hand to put in perspective how dangerous something can be online whether you are or aren’t alone.  The difference between each separate task is the difference between survival, death, and digital death (meaning digitally, one could be exposed of who they truly are).  It’s important to understand that the anonymous blackmailers are never found and always hidden, but they are the ones who do the most detrimental damage to the online community that is trapped in their endless cycle of tasks.  This even further emphasizes that secrets are all too easy to access, even when you think everything may be secured and never found.  The truth is, with technology, nothing can ever be truly hidden.

Image result for shut up and dance black mirrorRelated image

Both variations of fiction have distinctively different plots, but cross similar theoretical boundaries that would have been difficult to analyze if not comparing each to one another.  To start, by further analyzing Pinedo’s characteristics of the postmodern horror genre in Recreational Terror: Postmodern Elements of the Contemporary Horror, all of the theoretical concepts bind both of these pieces together. Pinedo argues that films produce a bounded experience of fear, the validity of rationality is thrown into question, and that there is a violent disruption to the everyday world.  With these in mind, all of them come into play with both The Woman in the Window and Black Mirror’s Shut Up and Dance episode.  Both take ordinary victims and bound in fear to everyday life situations that anyone could be doing, as well as the disruption of violence that initially starts off as subtle then grows into something massive.

Another main theoretical concept is that technology is the difference between survival and death.  For The Woman in the Window, technology traps the main character in the situation of life and death in the final scene, as well as her accidentally seeing the murder from across the street from her technological device.  Same idea for Shut Up and Dance, however Black Mirror approaches it with someone catching another person through technology, therefore manipulating him with life or death situations with different forms of technology.  This is important because it shows the differentiates of the two plots while connecting similar approaches to death by the producer and author.  In Norah Campbell and Mike Saren’s The Primitive, technology and horror: a posthuman biology touches on the connections of technology and fear in novels.  They mention that humans are withheld on the idea of technology that it is becoming a part of our personality, rather than a physical item apart of our lives.  People’s Dependence on technology highlights the importance of The Woman in the Window’s character encounters with social media, cameras, and ways of online communication.

When referring to the online communities and social medias, people become oblivious to the dangers they unknowingly experience in day to day activities.  This focuses on the idea that both works have their main characters reveal too much information online and not respect that privacy might not be that private.  The interesting part is that in The Woman in the Window, the woman deliberately reveals to another “familiar” figure about her life and private information. The difference is that in Shut Up and Dance, the kid was respecting the law of privacy, thinking he would be safe & no one would find out about his private information. This goes to prove that no matter how the distribution of information is done on technology, nothing will ever be hidden.

An important concept brought in both works but used through different approaches is the danger of the anonymous self. Through synthesizing both pieces, one of the most important pieces of information given to the audience is the fact that the main portion of danger is an unknown figure.  Not only is it an unknown figure, but it’s more or less like a one-sided mirror.  The anonymous person can see through the mirror while the woman and the kid can only see the reflection of themselves, not thinking twice that someone is watching their every move and how. It’s interesting to see similar techniques in that the audience is frightened of who could be watching them without their knowledge.  Any information may not be killing us now but will eventually kill us in the long run. On page 134 of Cyberbullying: An Exploratory Analysis of Factors Related to Offending and Victimization by Sameer and Justin Patchin, the elements of “perceived anonymity online aid in freeing individuals from traditionally constraining pressures of society and behavior in a normal manor.” They then further elaborate how this anonymous self can “get away” with more unethical and textual violence than in person. This is important because it explains how the most violence done to anyone online is through an anonymous figure, therefore it’s easier for them to have their target not know who they are so they can continually repeat this violent cycle.

Incorporating the audience’s sympathy into the plots is a huge element for these contemporary horror pieces. The audience is confused to whether to feel sympathy for the wrong deed done and the repercussions from that or that these figures deserve what is occurring to them.  Personally, this is one of the most important similarities when it comes to postmodern horror and the inclusion of how the audiences’ emotions should be. Both pieces include the main character having some sort of guilty pleasure that is caught by the so called “villain” (for The Woman in the Window, she takes picture of her neighbors because of agoraphobia, while in Shut Up and Dance the main character watches children’s porn because he is lonely and unsettled).  It puts the audience in this position where they need to determine if the main character gets what they deserve or if they should allow sympathy towards them and every bad thing that is occurring.

While these works are fiction, it stresses the danger of realities.  Though The Woman in the Window’s case is agoraphobia, an uncommon mental illness, revealing information in an online community is something that is very common, and the author incorporates this to stress the dangers of technology and social media profiles.  Same distinction with Shut Up and Dance, where the kid is literally the puppet to these blackmailers through technology, as well as revealed himself through an ordinary mac computer.  Both situations almost seem too real for a fiction novel or episode.  Finally, the thought of the known being more fearful than the unknown is applicable for both works as well. In Black Mirror, knowing the main character watched child porn and what could happen is much more dreadful compared to what he doesn’t know about his next task.  He will do anything to protect what he knows, even if it means encountering the unknown dangers. With The Woman in Window, she knew that every part of her information was revealed to an online community, as well as witnessed a murder rather than the unknown idea of what could happen to her.

The differentiating works have completely separate plot lines, but very similar theoretical concepts. From the anonymous self-generating more thought and the audience being incorporated just as much as the main character, the connections between this novel and episode couldn’t be closer.  Online communities seem like a safe, environment, promoting the idea that there are anonymous people out there that are a release for oneself.  Even with the privacy concept, nothing is ever kept a secret when it’s published online.  Though they are very different works, the contemporary horror theoretical concepts shared are all relevant to today’s society of death in the digital age.

 

 

 

Works Cited

Campbell, Norah, and Mike Saren. “The Primitive, Technology and Horror: A Posthuman Biology.” Ephemera: Theory and Politics in Organization 10, no. 1 (2010): 152–76.

Hinduja, Sameer, and Justin W. Patchin. “Cyberbullying: An Exploratory Analysis of Factors          Related to Offending and Victimization.” Deviant Behavior 29, no. 2 (January 22, 2008):           129–56.

Pinedo, Isabel. “Recreational Terror: Postmodern Elements of the Contemporary Horror Film.” The Mutual Dependency of Force and Law in American Foreign Policy on JSTOR, 1 Apr. 1996, www.jstor.org/stable/20688091?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents.

If the Dead Reincarnated as Online Personas

Throughout the entirety of Black Mirror’s “Be Right Back” episode, I was immediately transported into the horrid situation of a loved one leaving my presence.  As much as I would want this loved one back, it would never be the same, even if it was through artificial intelligence or the replication of their social media platforms.  While a woman and her husband are happily married with a kid on the way, the husband spends too much time on social media during a drive, having technology literally being the reason he is killed.  However, as the woman is talking with more and more people, friends introduce her to this new concept where the dead can be replicated through taking text messages, emails, social media platforms, etc. to try and mimic the emotions and communication methods this loved one exhibited.  The funny part is, technology was the reason the husband died, but was simultaneously the only reason he lived again.

By analyzing this situation, it was interesting to observe how social media can be our institution of survival as well as death. Even if social media were able to revive one’s online self into the physical self, who’s to say this person is the same or different while they were living?  As much time as people spend on social media, I personally argue that the social media presence in all of us will never live up to who were are as a person, our emotional styles, and our communication styles.  However, since watching this episode, I have thought much more in depth about if I were to die today, how people would really remember me, and could my social media accurately replicate who I was/what type of a person I was.  Even furthering this thinking, how I would personally remember my close friends, and if their social medias accurately replicated their online persona in real life.  The image of weeks 1-6 on the Death in the Digital Age blog accurately pictures anyone briefly idolizing technology, whether or not they’re missing it or loving it.

The Monsters Within

Monsters are a topic that’s not frequently discussed, however Jeffrey Cohen’s Monster Culture (Seven Theses) allows for a more in-depth way of thinking about a universally unknown lifestyle.  One of the things that stood out to me was was Thesis VI, stating “Fear of the Monster is Really a Kind of Desire,” because of it’s spooky ties to any postmodern novel, article, film, etc.  The entirety of postmodernism is to lure people in with the fear that they wouldn’t be able to face in reality.  Having people understand that this is within a Hollywood setting and not a household setting allows for some ease when discussing this culture. Along this idea, it’s important to understand that directors and authors are thriving off of this so-called “monster culture” because people are anxious about their worst fear, however they desire fear the most.

Cohan’s last quote of this thesis asks, “Do monsters really exist? Surely they must, for if they did not, how could we” (Cohen 20)? He is insisting that we are the ones who are most fearful of the monster itself, yet we are the creators and the true monsters of everything.  It’s fascinating to analyze Cohen because he dissects that none of this fear and none of this anxiety would even be present if it weren’t for humans craving fear, as well as being the main producers of it. When comparing this ideal to postmodern horror, humans are not only metaphorical producers, but they’re literal film producers as well, assigned with the job to stimulate the fear that other humans have created.

With the interesting point of humans being the real monsters, I found a powerful image that summarizes everything previously said.

Deadly Outcomes of Dead Cell Phones

Horror films have been a unique part of the digital culture for as long as we can remember.  One of the tricks for producers is constantly tying in audiences of recent generations and making the content relatable within that date and time.  As discussed in Modern Horror Films are Finding Their Scares in Dead Phone Batteries, films are working to tie in the most captivating content with the 95% of people who own a cell phone of some sort.  Including this fear to not have the ability to contact or communicate with an outside individual for help stimulates challenges for the 21st century.  However, though this article may further discuss these points, I believe there’s a more philosophical reason behind the “horror” in cell phones dying. Generations today cannot physically live without their cell phones.

For teens and young adults, the thought of leaving a cell phone out of reach is a deadly thought.  What if someone calls me and I’m not there to answer? What if someone likes or comments on my post and I can’t see it right away? These questions spark a new area of discussion; will our generation and the generations below us be reliant, if not addicted, to their phones being constantly charged in the future? Thinking of this idea allows me to reflect on personal experiences, and sadly I would answer yes.  Seeing the horrendous images in horror films and losing/forgetting to charge my phone both allow me to exhibit the same amount of fear.  Horror film industries are on track to keeping younger generations hooked, and further allowing us to realize that having our phone dead really is terrifying.