Manipulation of the Innocent

After finishing A Head Full of Ghosts, I couldn’t help but feel sympathy for the multitudes of times innocent characters were taken advantage of and manipulated.  For starters, the most obviously manipulated character can be seen as child Merry; she always feels tricked by her sister, she gets roped into an entire TV show exploiting her young life, and the producers themselves almost seem like they’re only using her too. Perhaps the most shocking manipulation was the very end when Merry was tricked into poisoning her family. This also happens to be the part that I’m unsure who the manipulator actually is. I have doubts that the father actually had the poison in his possession ever, yet how would Marjorie get a hold of it on her own? And if it was from Marjorie, then why would she eat the sauce too?? My best option here is to guess at a couple things about Merry:

Potassium Cyanide …. found here
  1. Merry is not recounting the events correctly at all. For example, she even claims she knows the police report says how they found her with curled next to her mom, yet still has a vivid memory of the doors being open and her aunt finding her. Also, older Merry says police found no traces of searches for poison on the family computer’s hard drive-> how can this be if Marjorie showed her images of it from an internet search?? (pg. 272)
  2. Merry might also suffer from an undiagnosed mental illness. I find this theory very provoking because familial links in disorders runs much higher than the prevalence in the general population. Also, how could any child raised in the environment Merry was in, end up completely ‘normal’.
  3. Maybe Merry’s sister and dad were both ill. That would explain him having the poison and the different ‘tricks’ that her sister did throughout the book. (Note here that I am a complete skeptic about possession and such and look for ways to explain these phenomenon through science).

If my last guess is true, would that not make all of them (Merry, her sister, and her dad) innocent? If they are all innocent of blame because they truly did not know better or what they were causing, then who is the real manipulator or the cause of the family’s deaths in the end? It is this manipulation of the innocent that made me keep thinking and pondering this book long after I had finished the last word.

 

 

Merry- The Unreliable Narrator

One of the aspects in A Head Full of Ghosts that I have found to be the most compelling is the choice of the narrator being Merry Barrett. Something that we touched on in our earliest classes was whether Merry is a reliable narrator for the events of the novel. I do not feel that we spent enough time on this debate, especially after Merry’s big reveal to Rachel about how her family died in chapters 25 and 26.

In chapter 3, Merry says, “my memories mix up with my nightmares, with extrapolation, with skewed oral histories from my grandparents and aunts and uncles, and with all the urban legends and lies propagated within the media, pop culture, and the near continuous stream of websites/blogs/YouTube channels devoted to the show…so all of it hopelessly jumbles up what I knew and what I know now” (Tremblay 13).

This quotation called into question whether or not Merry is a reliable narrator, through Merry’s own admission. Throughout the novel, I forgot that Merry said this, and became fully trusting of her recounting. This trust was most likely brought on by Merry’s narration switching from her 23-year-old self to her 8-year-old self so seamlessly (even though, in the diegetic world, the 23-year-old Merry is saying what we are hearing the 8-year-old Merry says). However, once Merry revealed that she was the one who slipped the potassium cyanide into the pasta sauce that poisoned her sister and parents, this quotation popped back into my mind.

I am not sure that Merry made up the fact that she was the one who put the potassium cyanide in the sauce; I definitely do not think that someone would lie about that fact. Yet, I am not sure that I trust Merry admitting to the poisoning either Merry, however, goes on to say that, “I’ve never told anyone what I’ve admitted to you. The police, psychologists, my aunt; no one” (Tremblay 281) Merry thus shows that she has been lying for many years.

For some reason, this called a lot of the narrative into question—at least for me—that we are given because it is given to the reader by Merry, someone who I find to be an unreliable narrator, much like Pi from Life of Pi or Huck Finn from The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn. Can we trust what Merry has told us? Can we trust a 23-year-old woman recounting something that happened when she was 8? Even if it was something so traumatic, I think the answer is no.

Pi from Life of Pi is a great example of an unreliable narrator. Which version of his story is true?

Works Cited

Tremblay, Paul. A Head Full of Ghosts: A Novel. New York, NY: HarperCollins, 2015. Print.