Warning: Undefined array key 0 in /home/digitald/public_html/courses/wp-content/plugins/radgeek-FWP---Add-Attribution-70acf52/add-attribution-feedwordpress.php on line 363
Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/digitald/public_html/courses/wp-content/plugins/radgeek-FWP---Add-Attribution-70acf52/add-attribution-feedwordpress.php:363) in /home/digitald/public_html/courses/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1930
Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/digitald/public_html/courses/wp-content/plugins/radgeek-FWP---Add-Attribution-70acf52/add-attribution-feedwordpress.php:363) in /home/digitald/public_html/courses/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1930
{"id":163,"date":"2017-09-03T15:22:41","date_gmt":"2017-09-03T19:22:41","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/digitalstudies.grantlabedz.com\/?p=5"},"modified":"2017-09-03T15:22:41","modified_gmt":"2017-09-03T19:22:41","slug":"is-neuromancer-warning-us-about-ais-deceptive-abilities","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/courses.digitaldavidson.net\/dig101-2017\/2017\/09\/03\/is-neuromancer-warning-us-about-ais-deceptive-abilities\/","title":{"rendered":"Is Neuromancer warning us about AI\u2019s deceptive abilities?"},"content":{"rendered":"It’s no secret that Neuromancer\u00a0<\/em>deeply explores the concept of Artificial Intelligence. We see the AI named “Neuromancer” attempt to trick Case into staying with Linda Lee on a beach — the AI’s ineffective last line of defense. But what if that last line of defense had been effective? What if the AI was so smart, that it made an irresistible offer to Case, having the power to own him?<\/p>\nInterestingly enough, there’s emerging evidence that AI is becoming better than us at tricking humans<\/a>. A writer for Forbes decided to do an experiment with an AI twitter bot: who could be more effective at getting users to click on malicious links: the bot or the writer? Surprising or not, the AI won 275-49. How? It was much more creative in the way it displayed deceptive content. (DON’T CLICK ON THE TWITTER LINK BELOW)<\/p>\n